guild icon
Mayflower District Court
#rrp_sam10-et-al-v-law-enforcement-training-institute
This is the start of #rrp_sam10-et-al-v-law-enforcement-training-institute channel.
shah
shah 2024-10-13 09:21 a.m.
What is your ROBLOX username?
BrendaPopplewell
List the plaintiff(s)
RRP_SAM10; 4YXT
List the defendant(s)
Mayflower Law Enforcement Training Institute
List the tort(s)
5 M.S.C. 1 § 3212.1
Provide any evidence
See discovery
Provide a description of the events
STATEMENT OF FACTS
_The LETI is the government agency responsib...
Labels
Civil
shah
shah 2024-10-13 09:21 a.m.
EX-0045-24 RRP_SAM10, 4YXT v. State of Mayflower ex rel Law Enforcement Training Institute
shah pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:09 p.m.
who
who 2024-10-14 04:42 a.m.
@Brenda you have been added
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-14 04:48 a.m.
Thank you
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-14 04:49 a.m.
I ask the court to direct service by the clerk
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-14 04:49 a.m.
I don't have the summons format
who
who 2024-10-14 04:49 a.m.
@Brenda I require a sworn statement that all actions you have performed for the Plaintiff as an Attorney have occurred after the order of the Supreme Court of the State of Mayflower revoking your suspension to the state bar. This means that the assistance your have provided to the plaintiff occurred solely after the revocation of your suspension. Provision of this sworn statement will support the court in the recognition of your appearance.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-14 04:50 a.m.
I solemnly affirm under penalty of perjury that I have not provided attorneys' services prior to being duly licensed to do so.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-14 04:50 a.m.
/s/Brenda
who
who 2024-10-14 04:57 a.m.
@Brenda prepare a draft summons for the court
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-14 04:58 a.m.
@who I don't have the format
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-14 04:58 a.m.
It's usually done by the clerk of court/presiding judge
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-14 05:03 a.m.
Will this do

You are hereby summoned to appear and plead to the complaint lodged against you in Rrp_Sam10, et al. v. Mayflower Law Enforcement Training Institute: https://trello.com/c/l4K3PoIM/185-rrpsam10-4yxt-v-mayflower-law-enforcement-training-institute
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1295013385414508565
CASE INFORMATION**

IN THE MAYFLOWER DISTRICT COURT FOR CLARK COUNTY

---

EX-0045-24 RRP_SAM10, 4YXT v. State of Mayflower ex rel Law Enforcement Training Institute

Trial Type: Civil

Judge Assigned: Judge GrandpaGobies

Complaint: Attached

---

UPCOMING COURT DATES



PAST COURT EVENTS



P...
Labels
Civil
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-14 05:03 a.m.
@Brenda
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-14 05:03 a.m.
@who
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@who I don't have the format
who
who 2024-10-14 06:04 a.m.
Who do you want summoned
who
who 2024-10-14 06:04 a.m.
The director? The attorney general? The solicitor general?
whowho
The director? The attorney general? The solicitor general?
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-14 06:07 a.m.
AG and SG
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-14 06:07 a.m.
Since this is a case against the government
who
who 2024-10-16 12:19 a.m.
@Solicitor General's Office
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-16 08:02 a.m.
hi i’ll have noa soon
shah
shah 2024-10-16 10:21 a.m.
Sorry guys I put ex-
shah
shah 2024-10-16 10:21 a.m.
it should be CV-
shah
shah 2024-10-16 10:21 a.m.
Fixed on the cardf
justind20
justind20 2024-10-16 09:06 p.m.
@shah Justind20, Solicitor General appearing as Co-Counsel for the Defendant in addition to @Nicklaus.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-16 09:14 p.m.
who
who 2024-10-17 01:15 a.m.
Ok I'm considering summons waived then @justind20 @Nicklaus
who
who 2024-10-17 01:15 a.m.
time for response starts at the time of your appearance
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 12:13 p.m.
The plaintiffs hereby invoke their right to amend once as a matter of course before a responsive pleading has been served pursuant to Rule 17 of the Mayflower Rules of Civil Procedure.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 12:13 p.m.
@who @Nicklaus @justind20
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 12:14 p.m.
The amended complaint is substantially identical to the original one. The only changes have been typos and format changes.
who
who 2024-10-18 12:19 p.m.
ok your time to respond is reset @Nicklaus @justind20
Doogy
Doogy 2024-10-18 02:41 p.m.
@capsulesalesman Added from filed NOA (I'm just doing clerk duty and have no active interest in this case, thanks)
Doogy
Doogy 2024-10-18 02:41 p.m.
@who ^
capsulesalesman
capsulesalesman 2024-10-18 02:41 p.m.
Thank you. I will have Motion to Intervene soon.
capsulesalesman
capsulesalesman 2024-10-18 03:05 p.m.
@who @Brenda @justind20(edited)
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 03:08 p.m.
No.
capsulesalesman
capsulesalesman 2024-10-18 03:11 p.m.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 03:30 p.m.
We would ask the court to deny this bogus motion. The LETI doesn't "verify" arrest records by use of any technology designed by the food chain DonaldMcs.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 03:30 p.m.
If the court wants to entertain this, we request an evidentiary hearing and proof of the technology, patent, bank statements, etc.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 03:31 p.m.
@who
capsulesalesman
capsulesalesman 2024-10-18 03:42 p.m.
DonaldMc's technology is indeed sitting in police stations and government buildings throughout Clark County. When you search someone's arrest records, as the LETI has done, you are using technology patented by DonaldMc's.
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
If the court wants to entertain this, we request an evidentiary hearing and proof of the technology, patent, bank statements, etc.
capsulesalesman
capsulesalesman 2024-10-18 03:44 p.m.
I do not believe that the Court has the power to request an evidentiary hearing. According to the rules, all one must do is "claim...an interest" to have the right to intervene. Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 19. I have done that.

I think you are confusing our rules with the need to "prove...an interest," which is the language of some other jurisdictions.
capsulesalesmancapsulesalesman
I do not believe that the Court has the power to request an evidentiary hearing. According to the rules, all one must do is "claim...an interest" to have the right to intervene. Ma...
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 03:46 p.m.
Incorrect.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 03:46 p.m.
The rules require that you show it.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 03:46 p.m.
Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 18.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 03:46 p.m.
Next question, please.
capsulesalesman
capsulesalesman 2024-10-18 03:47 p.m.
Honey...that is in the Rules of the Supreme Court talking about an "absence of second party"
capsulesalesman
capsulesalesman 2024-10-18 03:47 p.m.
capsulesalesman
capsulesalesman 2024-10-18 03:47 p.m.
Please do not mislead this Court with citations of irrelevant rules
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 03:47 p.m.
Delly, delly. Potato, potarto.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 03:48 p.m.
Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 19 only allows you to assert a right to intervene.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 03:48 p.m.
Your assertion of a right does not equate to a right.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 03:48 p.m.
It follows that the court has to determine whether you have such a right, which it can do only by clear and convincing evidence.(edited)
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 03:48 p.m.
Like I said, we require an evidentiary hearing.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-18 03:48 p.m.
We want the patent, technology, bank statements, etc.
capsulesalesman
capsulesalesman 2024-10-18 03:50 p.m.
Burps
capsulesalesman
capsulesalesman 2024-10-18 03:50 p.m.
Sorry...large lunch today.
capsulesalesman
capsulesalesman 2024-10-18 04:10 p.m.
TO: @who
CC: All parties of record (@Brenda and @justind20)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GqkOcD3x5PUWTc3sjM8To0WyFbPX5o7Q/view?usp=sharing
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-18 04:16 p.m.
get this mcdonalds fan out of here
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-18 04:22 p.m.
BrendaPopplewell will secure a full dismissal bc reading is fundamental
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@who @Nicklaus @justind20
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-18 04:22 p.m.
:👍:
who
who 2024-10-19 12:42 a.m.
Ok
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-23 01:53 p.m.
@who
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-23 01:53 p.m.
No response within 5 days
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-23 01:55 p.m.
The plaintiffs move for entry of default and subsequently default judgment.
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
No response within 5 days
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-23 04:17 p.m.
Silly goose! Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 13(a)(1)(b)
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-23 04:17 p.m.
response enroute tonight
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-23 04:18 p.m.
so u can bide your horses
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-23 04:36 p.m.
Per the Court’s order, you had 5 days.
whowho
Click to see attachment.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-23 04:37 p.m.
^^
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-23 04:37 p.m.
So, incorrect.
who
who 2024-10-23 04:58 p.m.
If there’s a response tonight that’s fine
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-23 11:23 p.m.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-24 03:29 p.m.
As the State is not contesting the facts at issue, we hereby move for judgment on the pleadings.
@who
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-24 09:12 p.m.
so long as we can brief on the law
NicklausNicklaus
so long as we can brief on the law
who
who 2024-10-24 10:07 p.m.
K file
who
who 2024-10-24 10:08 p.m.
both parties can file whatever supplemental briefs they want
who
who 2024-10-24 10:08 p.m.
@Brenda @Nicklaus
who
who 2024-10-24 10:08 p.m.
due in three days
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-25 08:31 a.m.
@who We would ask the Court to certify the questions of law in this case to the Supreme Court pursuant to S.Ct. R. 21.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-25 08:33 a.m.
This is a precedential case and I'm confident it would end up on SCOM's docket regardless of how this Court decides to rule. Certifying the questions in the first instance would be in the best interests of judicial economy of time and effort.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-25 08:33 a.m.
@Nicklaus
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@who We would ask the Court to certify the questions of law in this case to the Supreme Court pursuant to S.Ct. R. 21.
who
who 2024-10-25 09:13 a.m.
Denied
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-10-25 01:26 p.m.
@who @Nicklaus
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@who @Nicklaus
who
who 2024-10-25 02:37 p.m.
ok they can respond to that and file supplemental briefs
whowho
ok they can respond to that and file supplemental briefs
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-26 08:54 p.m.
can we have an extra day on this
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-26 08:54 p.m.
I believe the original deadline is tomorrow
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-26 08:56 p.m.
but I'm not home rn and the motion is only just over half done
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-26 08:56 p.m.
I guarantee these issues are definitely going to scom no matter what happens so I'd like to get all our ducks in a row
NicklausNicklaus
can we have an extra day on this
who
who 2024-10-26 10:22 p.m.
Ok
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-28 11:59 p.m.
courtesy
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-28 11:59 p.m.
@who @Brenda
who
who 2024-10-30 01:13 p.m.
This is being reviewed tonight
whowho
This is being reviewed tonight
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-31 12:56 p.m.
pls let me know asap if u need any supplemental briefs for some reason
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-10-31 12:56 p.m.
cuz im resigning soon
who
who 2024-11-01 12:49 a.m.
I grant the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings and find in favor of the Plaintiff under the equal protection and opportunity clause of the Constitution of the State of Mayflower. Unresolved claims under the due process clause of the Constitution of the United States are dismissed as moot provided the relief granted by the Court. The Court analyzed the policy solely under the broader equal protection and opportunity clause of the Constitution of the State of Mayflower, rather than the equal protection clause of the Constitution of the United States.
who
who 2024-11-01 12:49 a.m.
@Brenda @Nicklaus
who
who 2024-11-01 12:51 a.m.
The Law Enforcement Training Institute is ENJOINED from denying applicants solely on the basis of arrest records without conviction or formal charge, and must reevaluate the Plaintiff's applications on the basis of revised policies reflecting the equal opportunity secured under the Constitution of the State of Mayflower.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-11-01 06:55 a.m.
Thank you, your honor.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-11-01 06:56 a.m.
We would ask the Court to consider further enjoining the LETI from requiring applicants to send a screenshot of their arrest records.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-11-01 06:57 a.m.
In line with--
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-11-01 06:57 a.m.
As a precaution to prevent the department from continuing, in effect, to enforce its illegal policy.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-11-01 06:57 a.m.
@who
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-11-01 03:12 p.m.
Additionally, we ask the Court to consider whether, under 5 M.S.C. 1 § 3212.1's langauge "and injunctive relief reversing any harm done," it is equitable to order the LETI to review nunc pro tunc all applications denied on the basis of arrest records.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-11-01 03:14 p.m.
I should have made it a class action, but I feel it is still within the Court's jurisdiction under the statute to reverse harm suffered by other applicants,.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-11-01 09:04 p.m.
@who
who
who 2024-11-01 09:05 p.m.
i will answer this at a future time unknown to me at this time because it must first occur to me in a dream
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-11-01 09:05 p.m.
Okay
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2024-11-01 09:05 p.m.
Thank you
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2024-11-02 08:36 a.m.
Pls no xoxoxoxo
shah
shah 2024-12-10 10:20 a.m.
Assigned to @mike_bn
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-12-10 10:36 a.m.
@Brenda @Nicklaus what is this
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-12-10 12:01 p.m.
ok this is stayed pending ruling by sc
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-12-10 11:07 p.m.
if its remanded we will be back in session JAN 2, otherwise adjourned and stayed until then
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-03-26 08:33 p.m.
@krabz can we archive
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-03-26 08:34 p.m.
been in sc for like 5 months now
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-03-26 08:34 p.m.
we can pull from archives when sc decides
mike_bn
mike_bn 2025-03-26 08:34 p.m.
if they remand
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-03-26 09:06 p.m.
Ok
shahshah used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-03 09:12 a.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-03 09:12 a.m.
shah
shah 2025-06-01 02:58 p.m.
@Richo assigned.
Richo
Richo 2025-06-01 02:59 p.m.
Hi
Richo
Richo 2025-06-01 03:02 p.m.
Omg ur a marshal @masked.
Richo
Richo 2025-06-01 05:58 p.m.
It has come to my attention that the Law Enforcement Training Institute continues to rely on arrest records to deny applicants, in direct violation of Judge Gobies injunction. No stay has been issued with respect to the injunction in the Supreme Court.

Accordingly, you are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE within two (2) hours why you should not be held in civil and criminal contempt for violating the terms of the Injunction. A full Order is attached hereto.
Richo
Richo 2025-06-01 05:59 p.m.
@singhski
Richo
Richo 2025-06-01 06:01 p.m.
@Brenda Please serve a copy of this order to Isanwz (Discord ID: 959502552033034300), Director of the Institute.
shahshah used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-01 06:03 p.m.
Case Modified
@shah has added @singhski to the case channel.
shah
shah 2025-06-01 06:03 p.m.
@singhski
singhski
singhski 2025-06-01 06:04 p.m.
@Richo Your Honor, why are you asking me?
singhski
singhski 2025-06-01 06:06 p.m.
I have no part in LETI's hiring processes
singhski
singhski 2025-06-01 06:06 p.m.
or acceptance
singhskisinghski
@Richo Your Honor, why are you asking me?
Richo
Richo 2025-06-01 06:06 p.m.
Per the case records, the Solicitor General has formally intervened on behalf of the Defendant in this matter. You are therefore being tagged and notified pursuant to that representation.
RichoRicho
@Brenda Please serve a copy of this order to Isanwz (Discord ID: 959502552033034300), Director of the Institute.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-01 06:07 p.m.
Proof of Service
I certify under pains and penalties of perjury that I have served a true and correct copy of the Order to Show Cause on Isanzw by (1) Discord direct messaging; and (2) the LETI's Discord server.
@Richo
RichoRicho
It has come to my attention that the Law Enforcement Training Institute continues to rely on arrest records to deny applicants, in direct violation of Judge Gobies injunction. No s...
singhski
singhski 2025-06-01 06:29 p.m.
What is this based off of?
singhskisinghski
What is this based off of?
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-01 06:35 p.m.
I believe Judge @Richo is referring to the LETI's Enrollment Tracker on the intranet showing around 4 instances of this continuing to happen
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-01 06:36 p.m.
The injunction enjoined the LETI from denying applicants on the basis of arrest records. They have continued to do so, however, just using different terminology to hide it.
Richo
Richo Server2025-06-01 07:19 p.m.
Richo
Richo 2025-06-01 07:19 p.m.
See Applicant must not have any felonies, no more then two misdemeanours and no more then three infractions on their criminal record.
RichoServerRicho
Click to see attachment.
singhski
singhski 2025-06-01 07:22 p.m.
I’d ask the Court to extend the deadline by 22 hours just because of differences in availability and time zone. 2 hours is a bit too stringent
singhskisinghski
I’d ask the Court to extend the deadline by 22 hours just because of differences in availability and time zone. 2 hours is a bit too stringent
Richo
Richo 2025-06-01 07:26 p.m.
he's fortunate to be given even two hours, I was inclined to hold him in contempt immediately, but exercised restraint given his status as a public servant. He was online at the time the post was made and unlawfully continued this conduct during the previous admissions cycle as well. He has also recently received notice of the injunction.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-02 09:23 a.m.
@Richo It appears that Isanzw has failed to show cause
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@Richo It appears that Isanzw has failed to show cause
Richo
Richo 2025-06-02 08:12 p.m.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-02 08:16 p.m.
Thank you, your honor
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-04 07:48 a.m.
@Richo
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-04 02:52 p.m.
@Richo we ask that you give Isanzw 24 hours to show cause
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-04 02:52 p.m.
and then reimpose contempt, god bless, with all premises considered
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-04 04:28 p.m.
@Richo your honor give Isanzw 24 hours and re-consider contempt(edited)
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-04 04:28 p.m.
pls and thank you!! x
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-04 04:28 p.m.
the stay only stayed your contempt order, not the case
Richo
Richo 2025-06-04 04:28 p.m.
@isan Hi
Richo
Richo 2025-06-04 04:28 p.m.
SHOW CAUSE 24 H.
Richo
Richo 2025-06-04 04:29 p.m.
Let me add him here
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-04 04:29 p.m.
Case Modified
@Brenda has added @isan to the case channel.
Richo
Richo 2025-06-04 04:29 p.m.
Can u add him @Brenda
RichoRicho
SHOW CAUSE 24 H.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-04 04:29 p.m.
@isan The court has given you 24 hours to show cause
singhski
singhski 2025-06-05 06:19 a.m.
@Richo Your Honor, you cannot hold him in direct contempt.
isan
isan 2025-06-05 03:24 p.m.
4 M.S.C. 7 § 2703(d), which compels governmental departments to consider arrest records, was not deliberated on or considered in this case. For that reason, I felt compelled to continue the existing practice of considering arrest records during the application process for LETI.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-05 03:58 p.m.
The practice was explicitly declared unconstitutional. There is simply no excuse for violating an injunction.(edited)
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-05 03:59 p.m.
Given that Isanzw admits blatantly violating the injunction, we ask that contempt be issued.
@Richo
isan
isan 2025-06-05 04:37 p.m.
I guess the courts wants to see hardened criminals become those who are supposed to protect the peace in the state.(edited)
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-05 05:54 p.m.
(sounds like an intent to violate the injunction)
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
The practice was explicitly declared unconstitutional. There is simply no excuse for violating an injunction.(edited)
singhski
singhski 2025-06-05 06:03 p.m.
It seems that the Court would be enjoining him from lawful practice
singhskisinghski
It seems that the Court would be enjoining him from lawful practice
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-05 06:04 p.m.
:❌:
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-05 06:04 p.m.
it would be enjoining him from an unconstitutional practice
singhski
singhski 2025-06-05 06:05 p.m.
I don't see any mentioning of the statute in the injunction :👼:
singhski
singhski 2025-06-05 06:05 p.m.
"Stop doing that please"
singhskisinghski
I don't see any mentioning of the statute in the injunction :👼:
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-05 06:06 p.m.
Doesn't need to. The practice was declared unconstitutional
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-05 06:06 p.m.
And since you didn't raise this at a previous stage in litigation, you've waived the issue wholesale
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-05 06:06 p.m.
God bless!
Richo
Richo 2025-06-05 09:59 p.m.
@isan ORDER AND JUDGMENT OF CONTEMPT
The Court, having considered the entire record, the motion for contempt, and Director Isanzw's reply, and being otherwise fully advised of the premises, hereby: (1) FINDS that Isanzw violated this Court's November 1, 2024, Injunction enjoining and restraining the LETI from further denying applicants on the basis of unadjudicated arrest records; (2) holds Isanzw in INDIRECT CIVIL CONTEMPT pursuant to 5 M.S.C. 1 § 2104.1 and jails him indefinitely until such time that Isanzw files proof to the Court that he has complied with the Injunction; and (3) holds Isanzw in INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT pursuant to 1 M.S.C. § 1501 and sentences him to seven (7) days in prison to be administered upon expiration of the civil contempt. Along w/ 50K fine.
(edited)
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 01:00 a.m.
@Richo I hereby notify the Court that the LETI continues to violate this Court's orders. It has begun to edit its Google sheets to hide the denial of applicants with arrest records
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 01:01 a.m.
I just now spoke to a person in DMs whose application was denied yesterday due to an unadjudicated arrest record
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 01:01 a.m.
Yet, this does not appear in the Enrollment Tracker, as the the LETI edited it
shahshah used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-06 09:29 a.m.
Case Modified
@shah has added @isan to the case channel.
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 09:36 a.m.
PAPERLESS ORDER: Pursuant to 4 M.S.C. § 1601(d), any person convicted of misconduct is ineligible to serve in the capacity of a peace officer for fifty (50) days following the date of conviction. In light of the Court’s prior findings of misconduct, it is hereby ORDERED that Director Isanzw is barred from being hired, serving, or continuing to act in the capacity of a peace officer in the State of Mayflower for a period of fifty (50) days from the date of this Order. The Court reserves the right to enforce this disqualification by further order should any violation of this statutory ineligibility occur. District Judge RichoCornwall (Entered 6/6/25)
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
Yet, this does not appear in the Enrollment Tracker, as the the LETI edited it
singhski
singhski 2025-06-06 11:30 a.m.
Because they have since been accepted according to the LETI Director
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 02:01 p.m.
Incorrect. I am in touch with multiple individuals who have been denied due to arrest records.(edited)
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 04:04 p.m.
MOTION FOR CONTEMPT
I move the Court to again hold Director Isanzw in contempt. The LETI is currently hosting a training while deliberately violating this Court's November 1, 2024, Injunction to allow applicants with unadjudicated arrest records to partake. That's tantamount to giving every classmate a piece of cake but not giving one to Shaniqua because she's African-American. The LETI needs to stop.

I understand that Isanzw is currently being held in detention. I ask therefore that the Court impose civil contempt for his continued violations in the form of a civil fine of $500,000.00. I ask that the Court continue to impose fines until the LETI is in compliance with the Injunction.
@Richo
(edited)
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-06 04:08 p.m.
Any response @singhski @isan ?
isan
isan 2025-06-06 04:09 p.m.
The lion does not acknowledge the small dog.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 04:10 p.m.
App. 1 - LETI Training 06/06/2025
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 04:11 p.m.
App. 2 - LETI Training 06/06/2025
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 04:11 p.m.
cc: @Richo
isan
isan 2025-06-06 04:14 p.m.
The lion does not acknowledge the lawyer impersonator.
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
MOTION FOR CONTEMPT I move the Court to again hold Director Isanzw in contempt. The LETI is currently hosting a training while deliberately violating this Court's November 1, 2...(edited)
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 04:55 p.m.
Response to this motion? @singhski @isan
RichoRicho
Response to this motion? @singhski @isan
singhski
singhski 2025-06-06 04:57 p.m.
As far as I am aware, @isan has very little influence over who his Instructors accept into LETI. The handbook was not updated, and based on that they denied people with criminal records, not knowing about the existence of the injunction. I have also been told that Director Isan has tried his best to rectify the situation by accepting those denied previously.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 04:57 p.m.
...
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 04:57 p.m.
None of those denied for arrest records I've been in touch with have been accepted.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 04:57 p.m.
Which is approximately 6 individuals—possibly more.
singhski
singhski 2025-06-06 04:57 p.m.
Could you bestow their names, I think it is important we check this
singhskisinghski
As far as I am aware, @isan has very little influence over who his Instructors accept into LETI. The handbook was not updated, and based on that they denied people...
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 04:58 p.m.
So does the director intend to comply with the injunction?
RichoRicho
So does the director intend to comply with the injunction?
singhski
singhski 2025-06-06 04:58 p.m.
Yes, Your Honor. He has informed me that those who were previously denied have now been accepted prior to you issuing the 2nd contempt order
singhskisinghski
Yes, Your Honor. He has informed me that those who were previously denied have now been accepted prior to you issuing the 2nd contempt order
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 04:58 p.m.
Can you provide those records?
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 04:59 p.m.
And anything that will show compliance with the injunction
singhski
singhski 2025-06-06 04:59 p.m.
What happens after that is LETI's policy, they reserve the right to expel students for whatever reason
RichoRicho
Can you provide those records?
singhski
singhski 2025-06-06 04:59 p.m.
Yes, Your Honor.
singhskisinghski
What happens after that is LETI's policy, they reserve the right to expel students for whatever reason
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 04:59 p.m.
LOL this is not true. They cannot expel students for arrest records in violation of the injunction
isan
isan 2025-06-06 04:59 p.m.
Take a look at the application tracker, nobody on there has been solely failed for having a criminal record.
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
LOL this is not true. They cannot expel students for arrest records in violation of the injunction
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:00 p.m.
Otherwise, we will simply ask the Court to enter an additional injunction pursuant to the "and such other and further relief as the Court deems equitable" to protect these applicants rights.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:00 p.m.
God bless
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:00 p.m.
@Richo We ask that the Court enter such an injunction
isanisan
Take a look at the application tracker, nobody on there has been solely failed for having a criminal record.
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 05:00 p.m.
I've seen otherwise, can you provide the names that were previously done so before the records were changed?
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
LOL this is not true. They cannot expel students for arrest records in violation of the injunction
singhski
singhski 2025-06-06 05:00 p.m.
I'm not sure if this has taken place. Also, I have now been informed that they were not accepted, rather, their application was re-read.
isan
isan 2025-06-06 05:00 p.m.
I do not have a list of names.
singhski
singhski 2025-06-06 05:01 p.m.
and denied for other reasons i.e application not being up to standard with LETI policy
singhskisinghski
I'm not sure if this has taken place. Also, I have now been informed that they were not accepted, rather, their application was re-read.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:01 p.m.
Okay, so you admit to violating the Injunction :🤦‍♀️:
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
Okay, so you admit to violating the Injunction :🤦‍♀️:
singhski
singhski 2025-06-06 05:01 p.m.
No? If their applications were up to standard, they would have certainly been accepted. Is this true Mr. @isan ?
isanisan
I do not have a list of names.
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 05:01 p.m.
If you want to prove compliance with the injunction youll need to do so, version history if needed.
isan
isan 2025-06-06 05:01 p.m.
Very true Dr Singhski
singhskisinghski
and denied for other reasons i.e application not being up to standard with LETI policy
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:02 p.m.
@Richo This is untrue, your honor. I spoke to the Admissions Director in a ticket yesterday. He informed me that their applications have not been re-read and that final decision on these students's applications have not been made.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:02 p.m.
I find it reprehensible that the Solicitor General is making false representations to the Court
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:02 p.m.
And I thus move for sanctions.
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 05:02 p.m.
Ill review it shortly
isan
isan 2025-06-06 05:02 p.m.
I did this on my own and did not involve the Admissions Director, he was mistaken as I had not told him.
isanisan
I did this on my own and did not involve the Admissions Director, he was mistaken as I had not told him.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:03 p.m.
When did you do this? I'd like to see records, screenshots, version history
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:03 p.m.
And I'd like to subpoena the reasoning
isan
isan 2025-06-06 05:03 p.m.
Who are you?
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:03 p.m.
In fact, let's go in chambers right now and subpoena all of it
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 05:03 p.m.
@singhski I advise you to correct and retract any statements that may have been false before I do so, I'll give you the chance to do so
RichoRicho
@singhski I advise you to correct and retract any statements that may have been false before I do so, I'll give you the chance to do so
singhski
singhski 2025-06-06 05:03 p.m.
Let me confer with my client
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 05:03 p.m.
Ill look into all this later not home right now
singhskisinghski
Let me confer with my client
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 05:03 p.m.
Thanks
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:03 p.m.
@Richo I ask that the Court hold an in camera hearing to determine whether the LETI is secretly denying these applicants because of their arrest records—just under the table now. The Court has power to subpoena it in exercise of equity jurisdiction.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:04 p.m.
If Director Isanzw wants to claim that they don't meet the requirements, this should be subpoenaed. Simple.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:04 p.m.
In fact, the Enrollment Tracker said "Met passing requirements" yesterday.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:04 p.m.
Has this been edited?
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:04 p.m.
Or is Isanzw simply saying they don't meet the requirements because he's angry about the Injunction
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:04 p.m.
I'm utmost shocked.
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 05:04 p.m.
Ill give them time to amend any statements they made here in the meantime until im back
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:07 p.m.
@Richo Here's proof that they're still denying persons based on arrest records
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:07 p.m.
"Pending expungement"
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:07 p.m.
Contrary to Isanzw's claim, this application is still "Processing" and no final decision has been made.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:07 p.m.
They're basically refusing to review their applications and auto-denying them.(edited)
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:08 p.m.
(This is only one example. There are others who have been denied solely due to arrest records)(edited)
isan
isan 2025-06-06 05:09 p.m.
Mr deletevictim has been offered a spot in the class.
isanisan
Mr deletevictim has been offered a spot in the class.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:14 p.m.
Interesting. It doesn't say that on the Enrollment Tracker
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:15 p.m.
I thought you said a few minutes ago that he was denied
isan
isan 2025-06-06 05:16 p.m.
When did I say he was denied
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 05:20 p.m.
Who else was denied for their record? Provide all their names @isan
isan
isan 2025-06-06 05:20 p.m.
I do not have a list of names
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 05:21 p.m.
Version history it and get back to me when you do
isanisan
When did I say he was denied
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:27 p.m.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:27 p.m.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:27 p.m.
Your lies are falling apart one by one. Que tristé
isan
isan 2025-06-06 05:28 p.m.
Your words mean nothing to me.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-06 05:29 p.m.
Neither do your own, apparently.
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 05:36 p.m.
Prove compliance and amend any previous statements by sending it after this message here, before home@isan @singhski
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 05:36 p.m.
Ill make a ruling on Brenda's motions
isan
isan 2025-06-06 05:47 p.m.
Yeah ill get a list of names
isanisan
Yeah ill get a list of names
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 08:02 p.m.
Where
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 08:02 p.m.
Im home
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 08:04 p.m.
And last chance to make amends to previous statements made here, 1 hour. Do not edit any messages, for any amended statements send them directly to this chat after this message @isan @singhski
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 08:05 p.m.
That 1 hour is the only grace period I'll allow
RichoRicho
And last chance to make amends to previous statements made here, 1 hour. Do not edit any messages, for any amended statements send them directly to this chat after this message <@9...
singhski
singhski 2025-06-06 08:31 p.m.
Simply put, the statement is is that the status of their applications changed from denied to something else, e.g pending
singhskisinghski
Simply put, the statement is is that the status of their applications changed from denied to something else, e.g pending
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 08:32 p.m.
No more statements you intend to amend?
RichoRicho
No more statements you intend to amend?
singhski
singhski 2025-06-06 08:33 p.m.
Strike everything else, that is the statement
Richo
Richo 2025-06-06 08:33 p.m.
Im not striking everything said here, if there is anything else you want to amend let me know soon
Richo
Richo 2025-06-07 04:28 p.m.
SUPPLEMENTAL INJUNCTION

ORDERED that the Law Enforcement Training Institute shall immediately cease any further use of admissions policies that deny applicants solely on the basis of unadjudicated arrest records, in accordance with this Court’s Injunction dated November 1, 2024. (1) LETI may continue current training sessions already in progress as of the date of this Order, provided that no participant therein was excluded based on an unadjudicated arrest record. (2) LETI is prohibited from commencing any new training sessions, classes, or cohorts unless and until: (a)its admissions policy is fully brought into compliance with the Court’s Injunction; and (b) the Court has received and approved a sworn declaration of compliance as outlined below. (3) No later than June 9, 2025, LETI shall submit to the Court a sworn declaration confirming that (a) that all training classes and recruitment efforts have been reviewed for compliance with the Injunction; (b) That any policies or practices that previously excluded individuals based solely on unadjudicated arrest records have been rescinded; (c) A list identifying all applicants denied admission since November 1, 2024, based solely on unadjudicated arrest records, and a description of corrective actions taken or proposed. (4) Failure to comply with this Order shall subject the Institute and its officers to further coercive or punitive sanctions,enhanced monetary fines and potential referral for criminal contempt.District Judge RichoCornwall (Entered: 6/7/25)
Richo
Richo 2025-06-07 04:29 p.m.
@singhski @isan @Brenda
Richo
Richo 2025-06-07 06:56 p.m.
APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER

In light of continuing concerns regarding compliance with this Court’s Injunction dated November 1, 2024, ORDERED that DivineCrime is appointed Special Master for the limited purpose of monitoring, enforcing, and reporting on compliance with the Injunction. District Judge RichoCornwall (Entered: 6/7/25)
Richo
Richo 2025-06-07 06:56 p.m.
@isan @singhski @Brenda
RichoRicho
SUPPLEMENTAL INJUNCTION ORDERED that the Law Enforcement Training Institute shall immediately cease any further use of admissions policies that deny applicants solely on ...
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-07 06:59 p.m.
Hi @isan
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-07 06:59 p.m.
Will you be complying with the supplemental injunction
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-07 06:59 p.m.
Cc: @singhski
isan
isan 2025-06-07 07:44 p.m.
Yes but idk if I can get every name
isan
isan 2025-06-07 07:44 p.m.
Whats special master
isanisan
Yes but idk if I can get every name
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-08 01:21 p.m.
Simple! Check the version history and get every name.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-08 01:21 p.m.
It's not rocket science
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-08 01:22 p.m.
Unless, of course, you have something to hide
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-08 01:24 p.m.
You have 1 more day to comply with the injunction or you will be held in contempt @isan (see clause III of the Supplemental Injunction)(edited)
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-08 01:24 p.m.
I will be recommending a fine of $1 MILLION UNION OF COLUMBIA DOLLARS per day of violation to Hon Cornwall
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-08 01:25 p.m.
I agree with Mrs Popplewell that you can just check the version history.
isan
isan 2025-06-08 06:38 p.m.
Can i get an extension
isan
isan 2025-06-08 06:38 p.m.
Cause ngl i dont think i can retrieve the names from previous classes because of how the control center works
isan
isan 2025-06-08 06:38 p.m.
Ill try my best though
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:43 a.m.
You very much can as Google saves the entirety of the version history
isan
isan 2025-06-09 05:32 a.m.
You have no idea how our system works
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 08:39 a.m.
Provide the names for this cohort by today @isan
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 08:39 a.m.
Get one of your staff to do it
isan
isan 2025-06-09 08:43 a.m.
I cant post images in this channel but look at DMs
Arthur
Arthur Server2025-06-09 11:56 a.m.
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 11:56 a.m.
Ex parte communication.
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 11:56 a.m.
Is this when trying to do version history? @isan
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 11:57 a.m.
I believe you are trying to evade the court and therefore if we do not receive the info by today you will be held in contempt, once again
isan
isan 2025-06-09 11:58 a.m.
Its a google issue lol
isan
isan 2025-06-09 11:58 a.m.
I cant access version history
isanisan
Its a google issue lol
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 12:02 p.m.
As it seems you have many admissions officers, etc who can edit and view the document
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 12:02 p.m.
Please get them to provide on your behalf
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 12:02 p.m.
A Google Sheet does not mysteriously give errors for 48 hours consecutively
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 12:02 p.m.
You should have notified us beforehand.
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 12:03 p.m.
Cc: @Brenda
ArthurArthur
I believe you are trying to evade the court and therefore if we do not receive the info by today you will be held in contempt, once again
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 12:04 p.m.
I fully agree with this. Isanzw definitely has access to the version history
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 12:04 p.m.
He's simply trying to continue violating this Court's orders
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 12:04 p.m.
Que tristé
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:20 p.m.
I literally cannot go and see the names cause of how the control center works dude, version history doesnt load the names
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:20 p.m.
Oops wrong picture apologies, was on my copy and paste
isanisan
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:21 p.m.
You can see all the usernames are stuck on loading from when I changed the outcome for everybody who failed due to records
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:25 p.m.
It is linked to an external database so version history doesnt pick it up because it doesnt connect anywhere
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:25 p.m.
Idk if its too hard for u guys to understand tho
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:27 p.m.
Ive asked other AOs, it happens to them too cause its a google issue
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:28 p.m.
Ok
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:30 p.m.
The court will strike this image from the record
isanisan
It is linked to an external database so version history doesnt pick it up because it doesnt connect anywhere
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:30 p.m.
What external database
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:31 p.m.
Its an external database of all the usernames and details of applicants
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:31 p.m.
I'm confused
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:31 p.m.
Why can't you just give us the names of people who were rejected from June based on unadjudicated arrest records(edited)
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:31 p.m.
The version history is quite recent(edited)
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:31 p.m.
Because version history does not include names on the database
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:32 p.m.
because the names are being retrieved from another database
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:32 p.m.
so version history cannot connect to that database because it is literally just a static snapshot of what it was
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:32 p.m.
you can see in the picture i posted
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:32 p.m.
Ok how long will it take to get the names
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:32 p.m.
I cant
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:32 p.m.
Lol
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:32 p.m.
for the third time
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:33 p.m.
Because version history does not include names on the database
because the names are being retrieved from another database
so version history cannot connect to that database because it is literally just a static snapshot of what it was
you can see in the picture i posted
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:33 p.m.
Ok then we will have to find you in contempt until you find a way
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:33 p.m.
I am recommending a fine of 1 million UCD @Richo
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:33 p.m.
??
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:33 p.m.
Js cause u dont understand
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:33 p.m.
Lol
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:33 p.m.
No, because you violated an injunction that should not have been violated in the first place.
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:34 p.m.
Ur putting me in contempt because of a google sheets limitation
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:34 p.m.
I already was put in contempt for violating it
isanisan
I already was put in contempt for violating it
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:35 p.m.
You are being held in direct contempt of this court again for failing to comply with the supplemental injunction
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:35 p.m.
Cause i cant comply with it
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:35 p.m.
We have already placed you in jail, so we will create monetary sanctions
isanisan
Cause i cant comply with it
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:36 p.m.
You should have thought about that before you violated the initial injunction on Nov 1, 2024
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:37 p.m.
No wonder ur just a clerk, u have 0 understanding of anything im saying
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:37 p.m.
Or 0 understanding of my situation
isanisan
No wonder ur just a clerk, u have 0 understanding of anything im saying
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:38 p.m.
I am enforcing the supplemental injunction. The judge gave you a deadline of June 9.
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:38 p.m.
You can discuss this with your counsel if required.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:41 p.m.
Thank you, special master
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:41 p.m.
@singhski Any comments before I formally recommend a sanction of 1m UCD
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:41 p.m.
I find it reprehensible that Isanzw is trying to toy with this Court
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:41 p.m.
We all know he has access to the version history
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:41 p.m.
And, even if he didn't, he would be able to ask around and find out who was denied
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:41 p.m.
So his fufu extrapolates are tired and must be met with vehement punishment.
😭1
ArthurArthur
@singhski Any comments before I formally recommend a sanction of 1m UCD
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:41 p.m.
Simply that you cannot request version history?
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:41 p.m.
It is confidential per googles rules and only given to editors
singhskisinghski
Simply that you cannot request version history?
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:42 p.m.
I don't quite believe his reasons if I'm being quite honest.
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:42 p.m.
?? and then also the fact that it is metadata on Google's servers
singhskisinghski
It is confidential per googles rules and only given to editors
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:42 p.m.
Incorrect. This is a court of law with power to subpoena those records
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:42 p.m.
God bless
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:42 p.m.
and then also the fact that he cant access it, what reason would he have to hide it?
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:42 p.m.
But my judgment does not matter. He has categorically failed to submit to the Injunction, and he has a history of just ignoring this court.
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
Incorrect. This is a court of law with power to subpoena those records
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:42 p.m.
No pause. You need to subpoena Google @Arthur
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:42 p.m.
Your contractual relationship with Google LLC does not bind this Court of Law
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:42 p.m.
Immediately. Subpoena Google, because you cannot demand that information from him
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:42 p.m.
Hold on singhski got a point
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:42 p.m.
This is a Court of Equity and a Court of Law and its subpoena process trumps your contractual relationship with Google LLC
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:42 p.m.
God bless
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:42 p.m.
That is metadata he does not have to produce
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:42 p.m.
God bless these Unions of Columbia
singhskisinghski
That is metadata he does not have to produce
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:43 p.m.
He does as Honorable RichoCornall, a state judge, has ordered production
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:43 p.m.
This is a Court of Equity and a Court of Law and its subpoena process trumps your contractual relationship with Google LLC
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:43 p.m.
God bless these Unions of Columbia
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
This is a Court of Equity and a Court of Law and its subpoena process trumps your contractual relationship with Google LLC
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:43 p.m.
@Arthur I think this sums it up, Isanzw, as an editor of the Google sheet has a contractual relationship with Google LLC IN REAL LIFE
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:44 p.m.
@Richo @Arthur We ask that the contempt be entered in-game such that Isanzw can pay the fine
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:44 p.m.
1 million UCD sounds good to me!
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:44 p.m.
Can all stop trolling
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:44 p.m.
Nope. I am not trolling. He does not have to produce this metadata.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:44 p.m.
He does. Simple.
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:44 p.m.
He is under a binding contractual relationship with Google LLC and does not want to produce those documents to which he has been promised confidentiality
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:44 p.m.
Incorrect.
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:44 p.m.
If you need it ask Google.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:45 p.m.
Google LLC is under a binding agreement. He is not.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:45 p.m.
There is nothing in the Google Terms of Service preventing the creator of the document from sharing it
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:45 p.m.
He does not have to provide that data. Apologise to my client.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:45 p.m.
And if you continue to spread this lie, we will ask for sanctions
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:45 p.m.
Please stop asking him to reveal confidential metadata
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:45 p.m.
He doesn't have to do that.
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
There is nothing in the Google Terms of Service preventing the creator of the document from sharing it
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:45 p.m.
@Arthur We are now asking for sanctions against Singhski, JD for this
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:45 p.m.
@singhski Will he be complying with the Injunction?
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@Arthur We are now asking for sanctions against Singhski, JD for this
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:45 p.m.
Dr Singhski, SJD* first off
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:46 p.m.
I am giving many chances to Mr Isanzw to comply with the order of this court
ArthurArthur
@singhski Will he be complying with the Injunction?
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:46 p.m.
What does he have to produce?
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:46 p.m.
The names of those denied
singhskisinghski
What does he have to produce?
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:46 p.m.
As I said, he will need to produce the applications denied based on unadjudicated arrest records from this this cohort,(edited)
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:46 p.m.
I will set the later cohorts for a later date
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:46 p.m.
Singshki ive tried to explain to this guy that i literally cannot and showed evidence
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:46 p.m.
If you could forward that here again, what is the exact wording?
singhskisinghski
If you could forward that here again, what is the exact wording?
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:46 p.m.
Of?
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:46 p.m.
I believe the Special Master has spoken
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:46 p.m.
The request for the version history Special Master
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:47 p.m.
It doesn't matter about the version history.
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:47 p.m.
I just want the names.
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:47 p.m.
Mr Isan is babbling on about a problem that is purely created by LETI fault in re the version history
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:47 p.m.
We do not require it.
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:48 p.m.
@singhski
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:48 p.m.
We require compliance with clause 3 of the injunction
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:48 p.m.
Special Master, I believe Judge Cornwall has made it mandatory for the version history to be produced.
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:48 p.m.
Where
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:48 p.m.
ORDERED that the Law Enforcement Training Institute shall immediately cease any further use of admissions policies that deny applicants solely on the basis of unadjudicated arrest records, in accordance with this Court’s Injunction dated November 1, 2024. (1) LETI may continue current training sessions already in progress as of the date of this Order, provided that no participant therein was excluded based on an unadjudicated arrest record. (2) LETI is prohibited from commencing any new training sessions, classes, or cohorts unless and until: (a)its admissions policy is fully brought into compliance with the Court’s Injunction; and (b) the Court has received and approved a sworn declaration of compliance as outlined below. (3) No later than June 9, 2025, LETI shall submit to the Court a sworn declaration confirming that (a) that all training classes and recruitment efforts have been reviewed for compliance with the Injunction; (b) That any policies or practices that previously excluded individuals based solely on unadjudicated arrest records have been rescinded; (c) A list identifying all applicants denied admission since November 1, 2024, based solely on unadjudicated arrest records, and a description of corrective actions taken or proposed. (4) Failure to comply with this Order shall subject the Institute and its officers to further coercive or punitive sanctions,enhanced monetary fines and potential referral for criminal contempt.District Judge RichoCornwall (Entered: 6/7/25)
RichoRicho
If you want to prove compliance with the injunction youll need to do so, version history if needed.
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:48 p.m.
.
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:48 p.m.
if needed
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:48 p.m.
I am now presiding over the enforcement of the injunction
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:49 p.m.
The only power he will ever get in this court
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:49 p.m.
I am also yet to recieve a declaration
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 01:50 p.m.
@Arthur Do you want sworn testimony that none of the editors can access the version history?
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:50 p.m.
If you would like to supplement that to stop sanctions you are free to do so.
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:50 p.m.
My recommendation to Hon Cornwall will remain the same
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:51 p.m.
I do need that declaration though. @singhski
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 01:51 p.m.
And if Mr. Isanzw holds another LETI session he will be promptly fined by this Court
isanisan
The only power he will ever get in this court
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 01:52 p.m.
Silence.
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 01:52 p.m.
Counsel and inividuals with an IQ above room temperature are speaking. Speak only when spoken to.(edited)
💯1
isan
isan 2025-06-09 01:54 p.m.
Not wrong
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:57 p.m.
@isan This will all go much easier when you submit to Honorable RichoCornwall's authority and follow his injunctions
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 01:58 p.m.
I warned you back in December dear child
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:03 p.m.
Wait r u telling me i cant host anymore LETI sessions @Arthur
isanisan
Wait r u telling me i cant host anymore LETI sessions @Arthur
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:04 p.m.
You can hold them, but every time you do, I'll fine you 1m UCD
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:04 p.m.
Like LETI phases?
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:04 p.m.
Or leti classes
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:04 p.m.
I've been given instructions not to enjoin the holding of the classes
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:04 p.m.
I hope you have money if you are going to violate the injunction again
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:05 p.m.
@Arthur LETI phase or LETI classes/cohort
isanisan
@Arthur LETI phase or LETI classes/cohort
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:05 p.m.
ANY LETI action in re this cohort. That means even if you hold or do not hold the sessions, you will be held in contempt(edited)
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:06 p.m.
Ok
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:06 p.m.
Until you have complied with the injunction(edited)
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:06 p.m.
Ill go let the 150 candidates know that the whole class is halted because of you(edited)
isanisan
Ill go let the 150 candidates know that the whole class is halted because of you(edited)
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:06 p.m.
Because of you not complying with the injunction*
😭1
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:06 p.m.
Because I can’t *
👨🏿‍❤️‍💋‍👨🏿1
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:07 p.m.
You can still hold the classes
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:07 p.m.
But we'll fine you every time you do
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:07 p.m.
It's all up to you
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:07 p.m.
@isan This all depends on one question: will you comply and submit to Honorable RichoCornwall's authority and orders? Or will you refuse
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:08 p.m.
I cant comply
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:08 p.m.
I recommend the former option, unless you wanna pay millions in civil penalties
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:08 p.m.
God bless
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:08 p.m.
I already explained to you
isanisan
I cant comply
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:08 p.m.
You can. Hope this helps!
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:08 p.m.
Mr. Isanzw. I say this very clearly
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:08 p.m.
You had 48 hours to contest the injunction to say that you could not comply
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:08 p.m.
You or your attorney, @singhski did not bring any representation of this
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:09 p.m.
until the deadline was over.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:10 p.m.
(I also gave Isanzw notice of the injuncton back in December)
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:10 p.m.
(I warned him very clearly to comply with the injunction)
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:10 p.m.
(and now he's trying to make himself the victim after ignoring momma's warnings)
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:10 p.m.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:12 p.m.
You're at the mercy of the Court, Isanzw. Any consequences that are issued from hereonout have been caused by your own willful disobedience to the Court's orders
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:12 p.m.
Hope this helps!
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:29 p.m.
RECOMMENDATION

Upon thorough review and independent inquiry, it is the determination of the Special Master that the Law Enforcement Training Institute (“LETI”) remains in flagrant noncompliance with the Court’s directives. The following findings are respectfully submitted: (1) LETI has failed to submit the sworn declaration required by paragraph (3) of the Court’s June 7, 2025 Order. No attestation has been made. (2) Despite explicit prohibition in para (2), LETI has continued to recruit and schedule new training cohorts without revising its admissions criteria or obtaining court approval. (3) LETI has not provided any assurance or evidence that current training sessions exclude individuals who were unlawfully denied admission under policies inconsistent with the Court’s Injunction.

RECOMMENDED that (1) Find LETI in civil contempt for willful disobedience of the Court’s June 7, 2025 Order; (2) Impose coercive monetary sanctions in the amount of 500,000 U.C.D. per calendar day of continued noncompliance, beginning retroactively from June 10, 2025, until LETI fully complies with the Court’s directives and files the required sworn declaration; (3) Require LETI and its executive officers to appear before the Court to show cause why additional punitive measures, including referral for criminal contempt, should not be imposed.

DivineCrime
Special Master.

CC: @Richo @Brenda @isan @singhski
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:30 p.m.
No objections from the Plaintiffs.
🤣4
🖕4
❌6
🏳️‍🌈3
🦨3
🤫3
👨‍❤️‍👨5
🥸3
🐀2
⁉️3
🇳1
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:46 p.m.
Also
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:46 p.m.
I believe there has been a twist of words
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:47 p.m.
Mr Isan will be held in contempt per my recommendation whether or whether not he holds LETI sessions
🏳️‍🌈1
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:47 p.m.
500k per calender date
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:47 p.m.
Please stop spreading misinformation @isan
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:47 p.m.
It is your personal decision as Director to suspend LETI trainings
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:47 p.m.
The Court has not ordered you to stop anything
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:47 p.m.
Just comply with the injunction
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:47 p.m.
Bro youve literally just put a tax on me hosting LETI phases
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:48 p.m.
Why would i rack up like 60 million in fines
ArthurArthur
Just comply with the injunction
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:48 p.m.
I cant
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:48 p.m.
Ive explained it to you already
isanisan
Bro youve literally just put a tax on me hosting LETI phases
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:48 p.m.
Even if you don't hold classes, you are recieving a daily fine of 500k.
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:48 p.m.
So do not spread misinformation
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:48 p.m.
You can hold those classes
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:48 p.m.
Either way, you're recieving a fine
♿1
🔞1
isanisan
I cant
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:48 p.m.
I told you to provide me with this Cohort's applications
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:48 p.m.
That was 7 days ago
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:48 p.m.
You have now mysteriously lost those records
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:49 p.m.
I am not convinced
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:49 p.m.
Bro
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:50 p.m.
An admissions officer has made this for you to hopefully explain it to you why I cant retrieve the names
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:50 p.m.
To add onto what I said earlier, idk what else I can do for u
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:51 p.m.
Mr
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:51 p.m.
Either find the names or pay the fines. Simple!
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:51 p.m.
Your various excuses won't work and definitely won't trick the Special Master
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:51 p.m.
Mr Isan its not only one part of the injunction you have ignored. You have ignored the sworn declaration that you would change your admissions policy
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:51 p.m.
I have no receipt of such
Arthur
Arthur 2025-06-09 02:52 p.m.
You are being held in contempt for the entire injunction. Not only the reporting back names
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:53 p.m.
Yes cause ive spent the whole time trying to retrieve the names for u
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:53 p.m.
Cause im such a hardworking person
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:53 p.m.
I can get all that done for u after ive dealt with this
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:53 p.m.
Whats the point of doing the rest if im being held in contempt for this
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:54 p.m.
So you claim to have denied them but now you suddenly don't know who they are
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:54 p.m.
100% believable (not)
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:54 p.m.
Pay the fines or comply. It's entirely up to you
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 02:54 p.m.
But that 8M in your bank account will dwindle swiftly if you choose to malign this Court's authority further
shah
shah 2025-06-09 02:56 p.m.
Reassigned to @cabot
shah
shah 2025-06-09 02:56 p.m.
Under the Administrative Orders
shah
shah 2025-06-09 02:56 p.m.
Lord Chancellor @cabot
shahshah used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-09 02:57 p.m.
Case Modified
@shah has added @cabot to the case channel.
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 02:57 p.m.
Hello I will do justice before all mortals and the eyes of the equitable Gods
😨1
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
So you claim to have denied them but now you suddenly don't know who they are
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:57 p.m.
I didnt remember the names, i just went to them on the control center
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 02:57 p.m.
We will be vacating any contempt issued before
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 02:57 p.m.
Director
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 02:57 p.m.
Please only direct your comments to me
isan
isan 2025-06-09 02:57 p.m.
Ok
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 02:58 p.m.
I am not concerned with the previous violations of the Court, they are frankly too remote and should be estopped under laches
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 02:58 p.m.
Please produce evidence that you are complying with the injunction for the current LETI class and produce a policy that reflects your compliance for future classes
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 02:58 p.m.
@singhski @isan
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 02:58 p.m.
Understand?
cabotcabot
Please produce evidence that you are complying with the injunction for the current LETI class and produce a policy that reflects your compliance for future classes
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 02:59 p.m.
Yes.
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:00 p.m.
Good
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:00 p.m.
Understood
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:00 p.m.
12 hours to produce the evidence thanks
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:00 p.m.
Wdym the injuction for the current leti class
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:00 p.m.
What does that mean
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:01 p.m.
Also am I still gonna be fined 500k for everyday that I do LETI or is that out the window
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:01 p.m.
Ensure that your current class acceptance complies with the injunction made by Gobies
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:01 p.m.
No that is out the window
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:01 p.m.
Alright, I mean you can go onto the public database and see that nobody has been failed for having a criminal record
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:01 p.m.
Ie you didnt reject anyone based on a criminal record and if you did what steps are you taking to rectify it or produce a more proportionate policy
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:01 p.m.
That has all been overturned
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:02 p.m.
Those people have had their app read and a fair chance at BGC
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:02 p.m.
The only person that I am 100% sure about is deletevictim, he was accepted after class started
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:02 p.m.
I'm pretty sure everybody elses app was unsatisfactory
✅1
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:02 p.m.
Great that's all fine then, all that's needed is some sort of evidence of a uniform policy that ensures future compliance and how to proportionately address criminal arrest records
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:02 p.m.
Of course ill edit the policies to reflect that
✅1
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:03 p.m.
Bless you
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:03 p.m.
@cabot My screenshots show at least around 4 other people who were denied due to unadjudicated arrests
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:03 p.m.
What about them?
🏳️‍🌈14
🏳️‍⚧️13
🇮🇳12
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:03 p.m.
The only reason deletevictim's was accepted is because the Enrollment Tracker noted that his application was extraordinary. So Isanzw was unable to lie about it being unsatisfactory
🏳️‍🌈16
🏳️‍⚧️13
🇮🇳12
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:04 p.m.
But the Enrollment Tracker also said "met passing requirements" for the other applicants who were denied due to arrest records
🏳️‍🌈14
🏳️‍⚧️11
🇮🇳10
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@cabot My screenshots show at least around 4 other people who were denied due to unadjudicated arrests
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:04 p.m.
When? After the apps were re read?
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@cabot My screenshots show at least around 4 other people who were denied due to unadjudicated arrests
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:04 p.m.
Post here please
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:04 p.m.
Will do
♿7
❌6
🏳️‍🌈5
🫃4
🏳️‍⚧️5
🇮🇳4
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell Server2025-06-09 03:05 p.m.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:06 p.m.
@cabot This is a list of every person denied due to arrest records who met passing requirements
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:06 p.m.
Isanzw is attempting to defraud the Court
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:06 p.m.
This is why momma takes screenshots in advance cause I know how the LETI (and law enforcement industry) operates
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:06 p.m.
Where does it say they're denied due to arrest records
cabotcabot
Where does it say they're denied due to arrest records
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:06 p.m.
it doesn't. this screenshot was taken after Richo's order
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:07 p.m.
Is deletevictim in the current class
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:07 p.m.
He is
✅9
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:07 p.m.
every person who was denied due to arrest records was changed to "Pending" in blue @cabot
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:07 p.m.
Hes doing well and done a very good P1
✅9
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:07 p.m.
I confirmed by asking a few
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
every person who was denied due to arrest records was changed to "Pending" in blue @cabot
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:07 p.m.
This true? @isan
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:07 p.m.
We love rehabilitation
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:07 p.m.
Id have to talk to my Admissions Director to get a definitive answer for you
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:08 p.m.
@cabot one of them even says "pending expungement"
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:08 p.m.
proving that im telling the truth
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:08 p.m.
Who is that guy
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:08 p.m.
deletevictim
isanisan
Id have to talk to my Admissions Director to get a definitive answer for you
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:08 p.m.
Can you give me their username
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:08 p.m.
But he was accepted
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:08 p.m.
The directors username?
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:08 p.m.
Yes please
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:09 p.m.
Clu_eless
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:09 p.m.
@clu
cabot pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:09 p.m.
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:09 p.m.
Ty
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:09 p.m.
TheWeakestOfficerCC also made a post on the LETI's Enrollment Q&A sharing that he was denied due to arrest records. Was he subsequently granted? @isan
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:09 p.m.
The tracker shows 3 big green boxes
shah
shah 2025-06-09 03:09 p.m.
Please address Your Honor as My Lord the Lord Chancellor
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:09 p.m.
And not 3 big red boxes
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
TheWeakestOfficerCC also made a post on the LETI's Enrollment Q&A sharing that he was denied due to arrest records. Was he subsequently granted? @isan
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:09 p.m.
Yes.
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:10 p.m.
He might have been missed in the acceptance but that is resolvable, just saying if you showed this list to me previously rather then causing a big fuss then he could have been accepted a while ago if that mistake was made
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:10 p.m.
@cabot MiLord, if Isanzw says "They were denied on other grounds", then the Court should take judicial notice of those grounds in chambers to ensure that they're not just violating the injunction under the table
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:10 p.m.
Please address me as Chancellor thank you
💎8
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@cabot MiLord, if Isanzw says "They were denied on other grounds", then the Court should take judicial notice of those grounds in chambers to ensure that they're no...
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:10 p.m.
Chancellor*
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@cabot MiLord, if Isanzw says "They were denied on other grounds", then the Court should take judicial notice of those grounds in chambers to ensure that they're no...
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:11 p.m.
Chancellor, LETI decides its own standards, standards which are not violating the Equal Process Clause @cabot . They simply seek a satisfactory application, which many applicants did not have.
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:11 p.m.
It is very hard to have a satisfactory application for LETI.
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:11 p.m.
This might have been why WeakestOfficer was not accepted @cabot
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:11 p.m.
And why he mightve been missed
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@cabot MiLord, if Isanzw says "They were denied on other grounds", then the Court should take judicial notice of those grounds in chambers to ensure that they're no...
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:12 p.m.
Sure but if these individuals wish to challenge the administrative decision they should pursue an individual
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:12 p.m.
I see
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:12 p.m.
And the Office of the Solicitor General commends @sfyrixtoulis for passing the requirements for application. (He has or had a record).
🇮🇳8
🍛8
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:12 p.m.
But that is fixable
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:12 p.m.
Did he meet all the other requirements
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:12 p.m.
He just didnt pend for the group
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:12 p.m.
Yeah
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:13 p.m.
But I can allow him
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:13 p.m.
Please do
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:13 p.m.
Bless
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:13 p.m.
@isan Could you tell the Court whether pending is a requirement for enrolling into LETI?
singhskisinghski
@isan Could you tell the Court whether pending is a requirement for enrolling into LETI?
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:13 p.m.
Quiet
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:13 p.m.
I dont understand that question
😭5
cabotcabot
Quiet
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:13 p.m.
Yes MiLord. So sorry MiLord. Bow down MiLord.
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:14 p.m.
Chancellor, you currymuncher(edited)
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:14 p.m.
*Chancellor. Yes Chancellor.
✅16
🍛18
shah
shah 2025-06-09 03:15 p.m.
Yay is leti in compliance now
singhskisinghski
@isan Could you tell the Court whether pending is a requirement for enrolling into LETI?
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:15 p.m.
Pending to the group, yes within 24 hrs but I am fine with making an exception since this judge is being reasonable
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:15 p.m.
All it takes is a strong woman like Chancellor Cabot to bring peace and justice to the Union
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:16 p.m.
Thank you all
shah
shah 2025-06-09 03:16 p.m.
Yay alex j cabot save leti @@everyone
🤗39
✅15
shah
shah 2025-06-09 03:16 p.m.
:🤗:
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:17 p.m.
Hello everyone whilst we are here please sign this petition
Doogy
Doogy 2025-06-09 03:17 p.m.
?order
Dyno
Dyno Bot2025-06-09 03:17 p.m.
Order!

“Judicial officers are officers of unwavering authority and impartiality.” Minute Order to Hold Defendant in Civil Contempt, at ¶ 1, Kingley Napley v. Adolobee, No. CV-0068-24, (Mayfl. Dist. Ct. Feb. 19 2025) (citing Zrihem, et al. v. TDark99, 1 Mayfl. ___, ___ (2024) (slip op., at 11) (Cabot, J., dissenting)) (internal quotation marks omitted).

The Court will not tolerate any further disruptions!
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:17 p.m.
@cabot Your honor, Silkymaster101, who was denied due to Arrest Records, is still denied? Despite having met the passing requirements according to the Tracker
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:17 p.m.
I saved LETI, I'm expecting prompt payments from all LETI participants
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:17 p.m.
Does this mean im free from jail since the contempts made by the other judge @cabot
Doogy
Doogy 2025-06-09 03:17 p.m.
Not the time or place Dr Singhski PhD S.J.D. C.P.P.
✅1
🇮🇳6
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:17 p.m.
Sure you are free
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:17 p.m.
Are you even in jail
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:18 p.m.
Do I need to go ingame and free you
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@cabot Your honor, Silkymaster101, who was denied due to Arrest Records, is still denied? Despite having met the passing requirements according to the Tracker
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:18 p.m.
Thoughts @isan @clu
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:18 p.m.
He was also pardoned today
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:18 p.m.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:18 p.m.
(Tracker showed he met passing requirements)
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@cabot Your honor, Silkymaster101, who was denied due to Arrest Records, is still denied? Despite having met the passing requirements according to the Tracker
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:19 p.m.
@cabot We ask this case be sealed to prevent LETI students from bullying Silkymaster101.
cabotcabot
Thoughts @isan @clu
isan
isan 2025-06-09 03:19 p.m.
He mightve been missed too, let me see if he pended to the group and might be in the same boat as weakestofficercc
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:19 p.m.
It is for his safety.
isanisan
He mightve been missed too, let me see if he pended to the group and might be in the same boat as weakestofficercc
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:19 p.m.
ive told him to pend
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:20 p.m.
✅1
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:20 p.m.
he's doing it now
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:20 p.m.
God bless
cabotcabot used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-09 03:20 p.m.
Case Modified
@cabot has added @orange to the case channel.
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:20 p.m.
Excellent
orange
orange 2025-06-09 03:20 p.m.
Hello your honor(s) and chancellor.
orange
orange 2025-06-09 03:21 p.m.
I am orange bear
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:21 p.m.
Court Reporter Bear
Doogy
Doogy 2025-06-09 03:21 p.m.
Hello Court Reporter Bear
cabotcabot
I saved LETI, I'm expecting prompt payments from all LETI participants
orange
orange 2025-06-09 03:21 p.m.
We’ll send you the tuition payments for this term
✅1
❤️1
Doogy
Doogy 2025-06-09 03:21 p.m.
please transcribe the entirety of the contents of this channel by the end of this hour. Thank you.
DoogyDoogy
please transcribe the entirety of the contents of this channel by the end of this hour. Thank you.
orange
orange 2025-06-09 03:21 p.m.
Ok
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:21 p.m.
@cabot Thank you Chancellor for sealing this case. He will now be safe from incessant bullying.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:22 p.m.
and me too i hope
🏳️‍🌈3
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:22 p.m.
i will be applying to LETI next cycle
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:22 p.m.
i best not be discrmiinated against
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:22 p.m.
God bless
👨🏿‍❤️‍💋‍👨🏿1
shah
shah 2025-06-09 03:22 p.m.
Thank you to CIPAC
shah
shah 2025-06-09 03:22 p.m.
Should we keep this sealed @cabot
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:22 p.m.
I laughed
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:22 p.m.
Why is this sealed
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:22 p.m.
CIPAC wins again
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:22 p.m.
Yes, keep the seal to prevent the bullying of those new students @shah
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-06-09 03:22 p.m.
Your Honour, CIPAC would like to make a statement if possible.
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
In colleges and universities in the United States, suicide is one of the most common causes of death among students. Each year, approximately 24,000 college students attempt suicide while 1,100 attempts end up being fatal, making suicide the second-leading cause of death among U.S. college students. Roughly 12% of college students report the o...
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
@cabot Reason for the seal
😭2
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
Yes please address the Court CIPAC
krabzatonin ᴏᴍkrabzatonin ᴏᴍ
Your Honour, CIPAC would like to make a statement if possible.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
not you accentuating the british variation
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
Everyone Quiet
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
We have an isrAELI
shah
shah 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
SHUT UP FOR THE CIPAC COMMENT.
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
In the house
orange
orange 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
Can we meet the pope @cabot
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
Students may be incessantly bullied and become suicidal
Doogy
Doogy 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
It is so ordered. :gavel:
orange
orange 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
😭5
orangeorange
Click to see attachment.
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
HABEMUS PAPAM!
shah
shah 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
?warn @orange antisemitism during cipac comment
Dyno
Dyno Bot2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
:dynoSuccess: orangebear22 has been warned.
orange
orange 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
WHAT
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:23 p.m.
Habemus CIPAC Chief
singhskisinghski
HABEMUS PAPAM!
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:24 p.m.
Girl stfu with third person plural participle
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 03:24 p.m.
HEL
P
cabotcabot
In the house
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-06-09 03:24 p.m.
Your Honour I move for a gag order for those who interrupt CIPAC
orange
orange 2025-06-09 03:24 p.m.
Chancellor I move to bring my first witness
orange
orange 2025-06-09 03:24 p.m.
@hegex
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:24 p.m.
ALLAH!
orange
orange 2025-06-09 03:24 p.m.
Please give him access
singhski
singhski 2025-06-09 03:24 p.m.
NO HE DIDNT!
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-06-09 03:24 p.m.
We wish to express our deep appreciation for the historic role that the Law Enforcement Training Institute (LETI) has played in promoting inclusion, professionalism, and equal opportunity within the law enforcement community. Under the leadership of Director Isanzw, LETI has opened its doors to a diverse cadet body, including a record number of Jewish recruits. This effort represents a genuine and commendable commitment to equity and excellence, and it has not gone unnoticed.
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-06-09 03:24 p.m.
The cadets of Jewish heritage currently enrolled in LETI’s Fourth Class are among the most dedicated, capable, and high-performing candidates in recent memory. Their presence at the academy is not the result of favoritism or politics, but of merit, discipline, and an enduring commitment to public service—values deeply rooted in Jewish tradition.
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-06-09 03:25 p.m.
We are therefore gravely concerned by the court's treatment of Director Isanzw and the increasingly punitive actions taken against LETI. The severity and frequency of these sanctions—imposed despite transparent explanations and technical evidence—suggest a disturbing pattern of selective scrutiny. Whether intentional or not, the result is a de facto suspension of one of the most inclusive cadet cohorts in the state’s history, and the chilling marginalization of a Jewish-led institution.
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-06-09 03:25 p.m.
We call on the judiciary to exercise restraint, uphold principles of fairness, and respect the contributions LETI has made to a safer and more inclusive Mayflower. The Jewish community stands proudly behind Director Isanzw and the cadets currently caught in this legal crossfire. These young men and women entered public service with a spirit of unity and commitment—they deserve a system that honors those ideals, not punishes them.

CIPAC remains committed to monitoring these proceedings and will not remain silent in the face of actions that threaten the advancement and dignity of our community.

Respectfully submitted,
krabzatonin
Advocacy Leader, CIPAC
June 9, 2025
israelheart10
orange
orange 2025-06-09 03:25 p.m.
how did he type that so fast
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:25 p.m.
:israel heart:
orange
orange 2025-06-09 03:26 p.m.
Heres transcript @cabot
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:27 p.m.
Thank you so much Court Reporter Bear
cabot pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:09 p.m.
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:46 p.m.
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:46 p.m.
@Brenda Please liase with this guy
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:46 p.m.
@isan If this is true and verifiable can we get this guy in pls
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 03:59 p.m.
I'm not extending injunction to previous classes en masse because it is administratively unworkable but if people like this come forward and its verifiable we should try and squeeze them into this class
cabotcabot
Click to see attachment.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 04:17 p.m.
Looks like he was denied on "Background"
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 04:17 p.m.
if the Court wants, it can subpoena the reasoning for that
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 04:17 p.m.
I tried asking the LETI what background entails and they wouldn't disclose
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 04:18 p.m.
The statutory scheme, however, provides that arrest records constitute part of a background check
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 04:27 p.m.
I think they should give up the reason or rather let him be accepted into this cohort so we can remedy the previous damage insofar as possible(edited)
shah
shah 2025-06-09 04:27 p.m.
Ho
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 04:27 p.m.
@clu
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 04:28 p.m.
Without the need to do this en masse
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell Server2025-06-09 05:15 p.m.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 05:16 p.m.
@cabot I've received the above DM from a person just now. He was told he would be accepted into the LETI but—after getting 2 misdemeanors on his record—was denied
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 05:17 p.m.
Is there any chance we can squeeze him into this class?
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 05:17 p.m.
I agree
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 05:17 p.m.
Let’s do this
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 05:17 p.m.
What was his name he messaged me I believe
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell Server2025-06-09 05:19 p.m.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 05:19 p.m.
@cabot
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 05:23 p.m.
Great let’s get these two gentlemen looked at
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 05:24 p.m.
@isan
isan
isan 2025-06-09 05:25 p.m.
It was not for the record
isanisan
It was not for the record
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 05:25 p.m.
What was the reason?
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 05:25 p.m.
cc @cabot
isan
isan 2025-06-09 05:26 p.m.
It was not for his criminal record
isan
isan 2025-06-09 05:26 p.m.
Thats all you need to know
isan
isan 2025-06-09 05:27 p.m.
I didnt even know about his records tbb, and the misdemeanours wouldn’t have gotten him declined anyway since its within our policy to my knowledge
isan
isan 2025-06-09 05:29 p.m.
Deferrals are also a privilege
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 05:30 p.m.
@isan what would you say to this?
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 05:32 p.m.
@cabot i think the Court should make a decision on whether lavifys should be admitted based on a preponderance of the evidence
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 05:32 p.m.
whether it is more likely than not he was denied due to arrest records
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 05:32 p.m.
i, personally, believe that to be the case
cabotcabot used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-09 05:50 p.m.
Case Modified
@cabot has added @clu to the case channel.
cabot
cabot 2025-06-09 05:50 p.m.
Hey @clu :👋:
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@cabot i think the Court should make a decision on whether lavifys should be admitted based on a preponderance of the evidence
clu
clu 2025-06-09 05:58 p.m.
So the lavify situation is a little unique, let me explain
clu
clu 2025-06-09 05:58 p.m.
He applied last intake, and was a deferral due to not being able to complete the intake. I think he left during like phase 2 (someone can verify this)
clu
clu 2025-06-09 05:59 p.m.
*not left, expelled
clu
clu 2025-06-09 06:01 p.m.
Initially we viewed it as a mistake on mellys part, so he was deferred to this class.

He opened a ticket to claim his deferral when applications closed, and from there isan and melly looked over why he was deferred in the first place and found out there was not a mistake to begin with, and therefore his deferral was revoked.

He never applied this intake, and thus was never denied for arrest records. I would pull up the transcript of the ticket, but it happened before we started saving them (convenient I know)
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@cabot I've received the above DM from a person just now. He was told he would be accepted into the LETI but—after getting 2 misdemeanors on his record—was denied
clu
clu 2025-06-09 06:03 p.m.
Just to clarify, the 2 misdemeanors he got did not effect his denial. No one had any idea he even had a record at that point.
cabotcabot
I think they should give up the reason or rather let him be accepted into this cohort so we can remedy the previous damage insofar as possible(edited)
clu
clu 2025-06-09 06:04 p.m.
Anyone denied in the background phase would still have to pass the Final Review. Also, records do not play a part in the background check if that was not made clear already.
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell
@cabot Your honor, Silkymaster101, who was denied due to Arrest Records, is still denied? Despite having met the passing requirements according to the Tracker
clu
clu 2025-06-09 06:06 p.m.
Same is gonna go for this guy, has to pass Final Review.
clu
clu 2025-06-09 06:18 p.m.
all the people who were on hold for pardons were accepted though right?
clu
clu 2025-06-09 06:23 p.m.
nvm
cluclu
Same is gonna go for this guy, has to pass Final Review.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 07:52 p.m.
....
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 07:52 p.m.
Isan just said he would accept him
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-06-09 07:52 p.m.
And earlier in this case, Isan said he already reviewed everyone
clu
clu 2025-06-09 07:56 p.m.
Ok dope
orange
orange 2025-06-09 10:15 p.m.
Reporter of decisions clocking in
cabotcabot
We love rehabilitation
isan
isan 2025-06-10 04:16 p.m.
Looks like he has not rehabilitated
isan
isan Server2025-06-10 04:16 p.m.
isanServerisan
Click to see attachment.
singhski
singhski 2025-06-11 06:21 p.m.
@cabot Add actxrz
singhski
singhski 2025-06-11 06:21 p.m.
new sg
cabotcabot used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-11 06:42 p.m.
Case Modified
@cabot has added @actxrz to the case channel.
cabot
cabot 2025-06-11 06:49 p.m.
Is this case done
cabot
cabot 2025-06-11 08:15 p.m.
Archive
cabot
cabot 2025-06-11 08:20 p.m.
@Underprothonotary
BrendaPopplewellBrendaPopplewell used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-11 08:27 p.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-11 08:27 p.m.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-11 08:27 p.m.
Exported 730 messages